thread policy (probably approaching L2 at least)
Ronn! Blankenship
ronn_blankenship at bellsouth.net
Wed May 21 14:57:26 PDT 2008
Sorry if this seems to be violating the policy
which is the topic of this thread ;), but I'm
concatenating several posts into one in order to
address Jon's questions in a more coherent way
than by responding to each individual post separately
At 09:56 PM Tuesday 5/20/2008, jon louis mann wrote:
>--- Ronn! Blankenship <ronn_blankenship at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>>At 04:30 PM Tuesday 5/20/2008, jon louis mann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Safari? I thought that was something called a browser, like Netscape,
>>>or Explorer, or Thunderbird, or Mozilla, Linux...? What is OS X?
>>
>>
>>
>>For what it's worth:
>>
>>OS X, Windows (in all its different versions like 95, 98, NT, 2000,
>>XP, Vista . . . ), and Linux are all what are called "operating
>>systems." An "operating system," frequently abbreviated "OS," is the
>>main program which controls whatever happens on the
>>computer. Everything else which runs on the computer runs under the
>>operating system, iow, the OS must be up and running properly before
>>you can run any other programs on the computer. (Some of the geeks
>>here may point out that I am simplifying things here, but I'm trying
>>to give you what you need, not teach another course in operating
>>system design like I last taught about 20 years ago . . . ;))
>>
>>Netscape, Internet Explorer, and Mozilla are all examples of
>>"browsers." A browser is a program which runs under an operating
>>system and allows you to connect to the Internet and read web pages.
>>
>>Thunderbird and Eudora (which I'm using at the moment) are examples
>>of "mail programs." A mail program runs under an operating system
>>and allows you to read and write and send and receive e-mail.
>>
>>To make things more complicated (naturally), many browsers have an
>>e-mail feature which allows you to read and write and send and
>>receive e-mail while in the browser. Also, there are sites like
>>Gmail and the mail feature at Yahoo! and many others where you can
>>load a particular web page in your browser and read and write and
>>send and receive e-mail while logged into that web page. So you may
>>indeed be using a browser to read and write and send and receive your
>>Brin-list e-mail. That's why William asked you to look up in the
>>upper-left-hand corner of your screen where the name of the active
>>program usually appears so hopefully someone here will recognize the
>>name of the program and know something about how to manage its
>>settings. (Yes, all of them are different. Frequently quite
>>frustratingly so. And like with every other program, familiarity
>>with how it works takes practice.)
>>
>>I'm sure some of the others here will be weighing in with their words
>>
>>of wisdom (probably much wiser than the above . . . )
>>
>>HTH.
>
>
>wow, i think i will stick with what i am used to and just live with the
>results rather than make any more waves.
Really, it's not any harder than learning many of
the things all of us have to learn for our
employment or to function in everyday life, and
is indeed simpler than many of those things. Just different.
>one more question. if safari
>is my operating system and yahoo is is my mail program, what is my
>browser?
>jon
(I think that question has been answered by others.)
At 10:00 PM Tuesday 5/20/2008, jon louis mann wrote:
>>--- Max Battcher <me at worldmaker.net> wrote:
>>>jon louis mann wrote:
>>>is this what you mean?
>>>
>>>Yes that's basically what is standard.
>>>
>>>>it looks like gobbley gook.
>>>
>>>Yes, but computers like gobbley gook. So do computer people. There
>>>things out there to make it all look prettier.
In fact, to the computer hardware,
"It looks like gobbley gook."
looks something like
"010010010111010000100000011011000110111101101111011010110111001100100000011011000110100101101011011001010010000001100111011011110110001001100010011011000110010101111001001000000110011101101111011011110110101100101110"
where the ones and zeroes represent different
electrical signals (think of a switch with "0"
representing the signal when the switch is "off"
and "1" representing the signal when the switch
is "on"). Even computer people think that is too
much gobbley gook. Especially those who remember
the days of the first computers in the 1940s and
50s when EVERYTHING that went into the computer
had to be translated into a series of zeroes and
ones by hand before it could be entered into the
computer, and entering it often meant physically
setting a bank of actual electrical switches to
"on" or "off" to represent those values . . . of
course, since switches take up space, you'd have
to do it a few at the time and wait for the
computer to read those and accept that part of
the input before you could do the next few, so
perhaps you can see how programmers in those days
spent most of their time. Over time, programmers
came up with ways to make the machine do most of
that grunt work of translating human-readable
input into electrical signals which the machine's
hardware could interpret and then translating the
electrical signals inside the machine into
human-readable output. (Yes, of course I used a
program to convert the sentence above into a
string of 0s and 1s!) And one reason some parts
of programming seem so complicated to the
beginner is that such translation methods were
not created all at once according to a plan, but
like many other things humans have created were
developed one piece at a time, and sometimes
whatever was easiest to accomplish or whatever
kludge could finally be made to work became the
accepted standard because it was first, not
because it was "best." (Because of this, the
above string of 0s and 1 does not in some
absolute way represent "It looks like gobbley
gook." but is understood to represent that string
of letters and spaces and punctuation when
translated by one set of translation rules which
happens to be the one most often used in the US
today. If frex we were using an IBM mainframe
from the 1960s or 1970s, the string of 0s and 1s
which corresponds to each individual letter in
the alphabet would be different, so the above
string of 0s and 1s inside one of those old
mainframes would produce a completely different
string of characters when printed or displayed on
a screen (probably meaningless gobbley gook
rather than a readable sentence in English.)
Modern operating systems do a better job of
translating what the machine understands into
something that can be easily understood by
average people who have no more idea or desire to
know what goes on inside the computer than they
do about frex what goes on inside a television
set in order to give them pictures and sound when
they hit the "ON" switch, which is all they care
about. It is basically the fact that computers
can do so much more than simply play pictures and
sound sent from a station via radio waves or
cable or pre-recorded on a tape or disc that
means that ultimately getting them to do exactly
what you want requires more controls than a TV
set has, controls which in most modern computers
are selected from the screen rather than being
represented by individual buttons on a remote
control unit. Operating a computer and getting
it to do what you want then becomes simply a
matter of finding out where those controls are
located and what they do in much the same way
that operating your TV, cable box, and
VCR/DVD/DVR is a matter of finding out which of
those 30 or 40 or 50 buttons on that remote
control unit which is usually lost between the
cushions of your couch tells the TV, etc., to do what you want it to do.
>>>>i tried the link
>>>>and googled e-mail program, and understood about half of what i read.
>>>> i still have no idea what e-mail program i use...
>>>
>>>It appears that you use Yahoo!'s web-based email.
>>>
>>>May I suggest giving a Gmail account a try? I think that Gmail's web
>>>interface is far superior to Yahoo!'s
I agree that it is. However, although some
people really like Gmail, many of us prefer even
more control over our e-mail which lets us manage
it the way we want to. (Frex, as Jon mentions
below, he doesn't like all of his e-mail being in
one giant and ever-growing in-box. I agree with
Jon on this, but others like the one giant
in-box. As they say, there's no accounting for individual taste . . . )
>>>and it might make things easier on
>>>you if you don't mind learning to like/love/accept the differences
>>>between Yahoo! and Gmail.
>>>
>>>(Personally I used Yahoo! for several years, got angry at some of their
>>>stunts and quit...)
As did I. As have many people.
(So, for Max and others who have had such
experiences, do you think that Yahoo! will
improve if/when Micro$oft finally gets hold of
them? Or is this one of those rhetorical-type
questions which also qualifies as a stupid question? :P)
>>>You don't have to use a dedicated email program, but they certainly
>>>help.
Amen. And that means that _you_ will find
managing your e-mail lots easier than it is with
a web-based mail service or using the mail
feature of a browser program because both of
those are usually much more limited in what you
can do than is a dedicated e-mail
program. (FWIW, to answer something I saw in a
previous post from you, the program you use to
handle e-mail is also sometimes called an "e-mail
client." Just another name that for all
practical purposes can be treated as synonymous with "e-mail program.")
>>>On the other hand you could look into tools for your particular
>>>web browser to see if any would help with your email.
>>>
>>>Looking for Firefox I found no plugins and 1 semi-working GreaseMonkey
>>>scripts that would help you Jon:
>>>
>>>* http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/5594 - For Yahoo! Mail: Colors
>>>each level of indentation differently so that you can visually
>>>distinguish the differences when reading quoted email. (I can't believe
>>>that Yahoo! still doesn't do this automatically!?â½) Caveat: Only works
>>>with "Classic" view.
>>>
>>>I couldn't find an easy plugin to do Paste as (Email) Quotation,
[Primarily in response to Max:] In Eudora, frex,
"Paste as Quotation" is Ctrl+' (single quote),
while regular "Paste" is the regular Ctrl+V.
>>>which seems a shame. I would assume that you could easily adapt one from
>>>Thunderbird's source...
[Primarily in response to Max:] That of course
ass/u/mes that Jon is a programmer rather than a
turnkey end-user, and from his questions in this
thread it is obvious that he is much closer to the latter than the former.
[To Jon:] That is not some sort of geek-speak
insult. "Turnkey" means that the user (in this
case, you) wants the computer to work much like
an automobile does, where all you have to do is
to "turn the key" and go, rather than have to get
out and spend an hour rewiring things under the
hood to get the car started every time you want
to go to the store a few blocks away or to go to
work in the morning or come home in the evening,
or iow every blessed time you want to use the car.
>>>I did not find any addons for IE that would help.
>
>
>i have a gmail account, but i hated how it bunched all my e-mails
>together.
>jon
(My response above.)
At 10:05 PM Tuesday 5/20/2008, jon louis mann wrote:
>--- William T Goodall <wtg at wtgab.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>On 21 May 2008, at 00:36, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
>>> At 05:58 PM Tuesday 5/20/2008, William T Goodall wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Safari is a web browser so Jon must be using web mail of some sort.
>>>>
>>>>Since it seems rather feature poor I suspect
>>>>it is his ISP's basic web mail access.
>>>
>>>
>>>Sounds about right.
>>>
>>>So can you think of any e-mail program he might be able to download
>>>from the web which would give him more features without having too
>>>steep a learning curve?
>>
>>I can't think of one that is any simpler than Mail.app, the one that
>>
>>comes with the computer. The only bit that could be considered hard is
>>setting up accounts which is much the same with every mail client.
>>
>>Apple provide an illustrated walk-through of setting up and using Mail here:
>>
>>http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304773
>>
>>Tricky Maru
>
>
>i misunderstood and thought safari was an operating system, but it's a
>browser. all i know is i click on the safari icon and it takes me to
>my home page - yahoo.
Okay, a _little_ bit of detail here. What
happens when you click on the "Safari" icon on
your screen is that by doing that you are telling
your computer's operating system to start the
program that that particular icon is associated
with. (The reason it takes a few moments is that
the OS has to look up where on your computer's
hard drive the program you asked for is located
and then to load it into working memory and tell
it to get started, but for the moment you don't
absolutely have to know those details.) When
Safari starts, it looks up the settings you (or
your tech guy) set when Safari was first
installed on your computer and finds that the
setting for "Home Page" tells it that your home
page is yahoo.com (that's the main page at
Yahoo!: if you told Yahoo! to remember your
username and password when you get to yahoo.com
it checks and sees that you told it to remember
your information and so takes you on to your
individual home page at Yahoo!, typically too
fast for you to see the intermediate steps on your screen).
My point in describing all that is so you realize
that when you click on the Safari icon it sets
into motion a series of several steps which
involve both your operating system and the Safari
browser (as well as in this case stuff that
Yahoo! has at their web site), which means that
one reason that explaining what you need to do to
set things up is complicated is that two or more
different programs are involved, each with its
own range of options that can be changed, and so
to set things up so they work the way they ought
to we first must determine which program is
actually responsible for accomplishing the
function we want to change and then locating how
to make the change. And if it all seems like it
is way too complicated, actually much of the
reason it is so complicated is to make it less
complicated for the user like you who doesn't
want to know all this stuff, much less have to do
it all by hand every time you want to run any
individual program. (Others here on the list who
have been fooling around with computers long
enough to have worked on mainframes when you did
have to do so much of this stuff for yourself
instead of being able to leave much or all of it
up to the machine will be able to verify how much
easier it is now . . . once they stop shuddering
from the horrible memories of those days that
this discussion has stirred up, that is. ;))
> when i got this computer the genius guy set up
>the mail program that is on the computer (the postage stamp icon with a
>hawk). i didn't like it. i eventually lost all the data when they
>replaced my hard disk
Okay, perhaps after we get you up to speed with
what's going on when you send and receive e-mail
someone should introduce you to the very
important concept of "backing up your files."
>and logic board. fortunately i still had
>everything that was stored on yahoo.
Yep. That's because when you use Yahoo! or Gmail
or a similar on-line service all of your e-mails
are stored on the hard drive of _their_ computer,
so if the hard drive on _your_ computer has to be
replaced, the e-mails are still on their
computer. However, you should still make and
keep backups for yourself, in case someday
something happens to their copies or their
service and as a result you cannot access their copies.
. . . ronn! :)
More information about the Brin-l
mailing list