Nature Assumption (was Asbergers)
dsummersminet at comcast.net
dsummersminet at comcast.net
Thu Jun 26 06:29:28 PDT 2008
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Julia Thompson degges at chiba.3jane.net
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:13:09 -0500 (CDT)
To: brin-l at mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Nature Assumption (was Asbergers)
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, William T Goodall wrote:
>> The dynastic tendency in families is a counterexample to this. It's very
>> noticeable how the children of doctors tend to be doctors or
>> veterinarians. Also politics, acting, sports, music and writing. There
>> are some second-generation cosmonauts and astronauts now. The odds
>> against that would be astronomical if parents didn't influence their
>> children :-)
>And the odds of 2 mathematicians raising someone who would become a
>mathematician would be incalculable.
By anyone who's not a mathamatician (thanks for letting me finish the line
Julia).
Dan M.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint
More information about the Brin-l
mailing list